Home » How to curb hallucinations in Copilot (and other genAI tools)

How to curb hallucinations in Copilot (and other genAI tools)

by Priya Kapoor
2 minutes read

How to Reduce Hallucinations in Copilot and Other GenAI Tools

In the realm of AI chatbots, Copilot stands out as a formidable ally, assisting users in various tasks across Microsoft’s suite of products. However, like any technology, it has its quirks. One prevalent issue is the occurrence of hallucinations, where Copilot generates inaccurate or fictional information to fill gaps in its knowledge. This phenomenon is not unique to Copilot but is inherent in the design of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, due to mathematical constraints.

Understanding the Challenge of Hallucinations

OpenAI’s research has shed light on the inevitability of hallucinations in LLMs. These models, when faced with uncertainty, tend to produce plausible yet incorrect statements instead of admitting to gaps in knowledge. This behavior stems from a training and evaluation process that rewards guessing over acknowledging uncertainty. The implications of hallucinations can range from innocuous inaccuracies in business reports to potentially damaging misinformation in legal documents.

Strategies to Mitigate Hallucinations

To navigate the pitfalls of AI hallucinations, specific strategies can be employed to steer Copilot and other genAI tools towards more reliable outputs:

1. Set the Tone and Be Precise

– Instruct Copilot to adopt a “just-the-facts” tone to reduce the likelihood of hallucinations.

– Clearly outline the information you seek to avoid ambiguity that could lead to inaccuracies.

2. Provide Context in Prompts

– Furnish Copilot with relevant context, including the document’s purpose and target audience, to guide its research effectively.

3. Direct Copilot to Reliable Sources

– Specify trustworthy sources for Copilot to reference, minimizing the chance of hallucinations based on questionable information.

4. Avoid Open-Ended Questions

– Pose targeted, specific questions to limit Copilot’s scope and enhance the accuracy of its responses.

5. Utilize Chain-of-Thought Prompting

– Employ a step-by-step reasoning approach to prompt Copilot, aiding in identifying logical inconsistencies or unsupported claims.

6. Leverage Copilot’s Smart Mode

– Opt for Smart mode to harness the latest advancements in AI models for more reliable outputs and reduced hallucinations.

7. Verify Facts Independently

– Double-check Copilot’s citations and conduct additional research to validate the information provided.

8. Encourage Honest Responses

– Prompt Copilot to admit when it lacks sufficient information or cannot provide a reliable answer.

9. Exercise Caution and Oversight

– Avoid relying solely on Copilot for final drafts and maintain an active role in fact-checking and verification processes.

10. Maintain a Professional Relationship

– Remember that Copilot is a tool, not a friend, and prioritize accuracy over pleasantries to mitigate the risk of AI-generated falsehoods.

By implementing these proactive measures and fostering a vigilant approach to AI interactions, users can harness the power of genAI tools like Copilot while minimizing the impact of hallucinations. As technology continues to advance, staying informed and vigilant remains key to navigating the evolving landscape of AI-driven assistance.

You may also like