Home » Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning should never have been made. Here’s why

Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning should never have been made. Here’s why

by Priya Kapoor
1 minutes read

Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning: A Misstep in the Franchise

Christopher McQuarrie’s takeover of the Mission: Impossible series revitalized it with Rogue Nation, setting a high bar with a compelling storyline and memorable characters like Ilsa Faust and Solomon Lane. The subsequent Fallout continued this success, raising the stakes and delivering top-notch action sequences that garnered critical acclaim.

However, with The Final Reckoning, the series seems to lose its grip on what made its predecessor shine. Despite showcasing mind-blowing stunts, the film’s bloated runtime and an abundance of characters dilute the impact of the narrative. The Entity, the main AI villain, fails to evoke the same depth and menace as previous antagonists like Lane.

In contrast to Fallout’s tight-knit ensemble, The Final Reckoning introduces a new team that lacks the chemistry and connection of the original core group. While Henry Cavill’s presence adds muscle to the action, the film’s slower pace and lack of consistent thrills leave much to be desired. The excessive focus on tying up loose ends and convoluted flashbacks detracts from the overall viewing experience.

Ultimately, The Final Reckoning falls short of the high standards set by its predecessors, receiving lukewarm reviews compared to the franchise’s usual acclaim. Perhaps it would have been wiser to conclude the series on a high note with Fallout, rather than extending it into what feels like an unnecessary and underwhelming continuation.

As Mission: Impossible fans, we can appreciate the efforts to expand the story, but sometimes, it’s best to know when to bow out gracefully. Let’s hope that future installments, if any, can recapture the magic that made the series a standout in the action genre.

You may also like